Best Payment Gateways for Browser Extensions

Analysis of the best payment processors, transaction fees, local tax liability, and approval checklists for this industry vertical.

Vertical Recommendation

The best payment gateways for Chrome and Safari extensions are **Paddle** or **Lemon Squeezy**. Since browser extensions lack server sessions, MoR checkouts redirect users to a web portal to complete payments, automatically managing global sales tax compliance.

Payment Platform Leaderboard

Paddle

Merchant of Record

MoR platform for software companies that handles payments, tax and compliance layers.

Risk:Lower risk

Fees:5%

MoR: Yes

Lemon Squeezy

Merchant of Record

MoR for software, subscriptions and digital products with clear prohibited product boundaries.

Risk:Lower risk

Fees:5%

MoR: Yes

Stripe

Payment gateway / PayFac

Developer-friendly card payments for standard SaaS and software businesses, with strong risk screening.

Risk:Lower risk

Fees:2.9%

MoR: No

Dodo Payments

MoR / global payments for digital businesses

Newer global payment platform for digital businesses; public policy detail should be verified closely.

Risk:Lower risk

Fees:4.5%

MoR: Yes

Polar

Developer monetization / MoR-like platform

Developer-focused monetization for open-source, products, sponsorships and subscriptions.

Risk:Lower risk

Fees:4%

MoR: Yes, for supported use cases

Industry Risk Factors

·Stripe requires a company and files tax manually. MoRs handle software taxes automatically.
·Extensions that automate social media actions or scraping face high rejection rates under Paddle's AUP.
·You must link your checkout flow back to a verified domain matching the extension store listing.

Suggested Action Plan

·Extension source code containing scraping scripts targeting LinkedIn or social sites
·Failing to provide a clear explanation of extension permissions to auditors
·Missing privacy guidelines regarding user browser data collection

Anonymized Developer Cases

Onboarding RejectedCountry: India

Case ID: case-02

Paddle rejected my extension due to scraping code in client script

Applied to Paddle for a LinkedIn outreach tool chrome extension. Onboarding team audited the extension source code and rejected it under their AUP for 'unauthorized scraping and automation' of third-party platforms.

Developer Lesson & Advice:

// Paddle is extremely strict about web scraping and automation products. If your extension interacts with social networks or automates actions, they will reject you outright.

Regulatory Evidence Sources

Paddle Acceptable Use Policy: What Am I Not Allowed To Sell?

Used for software focus, prohibited categories, restricted content generation, scraping-adjacent and adult content risks.

Checked: 2026-06-09Official Policy

Lemon Squeezy Terms, Appendix A Prohibited Products/Services

Used for digital product scope, IP ownership, age-restricted, adult, regulated and prohibited product risks.

Checked: 2026-06-09Official Policy

Stripe Prohibited and Restricted Businesses

Used to identify restricted categories such as adult content, regulated services, and other high-risk business models.

Checked: 2026-06-09Official Policy

Disclaimer: This tool is for informational purposes only. It does not provide legal, tax, financial, or compliance advice. Payment platforms may change policies or make case-by-case decisions. Always verify with the official provider before applying or integrating.